What is Deification?

Some have called it the essence of sin, others the depths of salvation. Regardless of one’s evaluation of it, however, deification throughout Western history has been a part of human aspiration. From the ancient pharaohs to modern transhumanists, humans have envisioned their own divinity. These visionaries include not only history’s greatest megalomaniacs, but also mystics, sages, apostles, prophets, magicians, bishops, philosophers, atheists and monks. Some aimed for independent deity, others realized their eternal union with God. Some anticipated godhood in heaven, others walked as gods on earth. Some accepted divinity by grace, others achieved it by their own will to power. There is no single form of deification (indeed, deification is as manifold as the human conception of God), but the many types are united by a set of interlocking themes: achieving immortality, wielding superhuman power, being filled with supernatural knowledge or love—and through these means transcending normal human (or at least “earthly”) nature.

Subscribe to get access

Read more of this content when you subscribe today.

The Danger of Believing in a Transcendent God

It is dangerous to believe in a “wholly other” God, a being so much higher than humanity, there is an infinite distance in between. Such a doctrine makes havoc of humanity in God’s image. This God, the ultimate Ruler and Circumference of all being, is the Hebrew god girded in the language of Plato’s forms. 

Subscribe to get access

Read more of this content when you subscribe today.

Gospel Manuscripts

One might think that Gospel manuscripts would solve the problem of dating. But no complete Bibles have been found that date earlier than about the mid fourth-century (more than 300 years after Jesus). Apologists boast that the New Testament is the best attested text in antiquity (5600 manuscripts!), but they don’t tell you that in the earliest period, the “manuscripts” are mostly scraps of papyrus, sometimes no bigger than a credit card, with paper that looks like it passed through a low-quality shredder. Some of these texts were found in ancient garbage heaps, which means that even in antiquity they were considered to be trash.

And not a single one of these Gospel papyri have dates. They are all dated by handwriting, an inherently subjective judgment of inherently subjective scholars. So here is the game that conservative scholars play with the papyri: they know that the so-called “original” copies of the Gospels have all perished, so they need to get the papyri as close to Jesus as they can. Thus they scour the other books of published papyri for early and datable examples which they can then compare with Gospel papyri. Then they say that the handwriting of the early papyri looks like the handwriting of the Gospel papyri. And—voilà—they move the Gospel papyri as close to the late first century as they can.

Subscribe to get access

Read more of this content when you subscribe today.

Christian Mythology

Church tradition is a euphemism for Christian mythology. The church tell you when the Gospels were written and by whom, but the question is: why would you believe it? If you were trying to study church ideology and mythology, why would you use a myth internal to the church to tell you when a document was written? Church tradition isn’t history. It’s mythology written by the first Christian apologists who are doing the same thing that modern apologists do: trying to get the Gospels as close to Jesus as they can.

Let’s use an analogy. If you were studying the Book of Mormon and wanted to fully understand its origins, would you automatically accept the Mormon tradition that the text originated from writing on golden plates buried in Palmyra, New York? Wouldn’t you ask for the plates themselves, or try to find them yourself? And if you couldn’t find them, you would use comparative 19th-century literature and linguistic analysis to determine when and how the texts were written and by whom.

The same applies to the texts of the Gospels.

Subscribe to get access

Read more of this content when you subscribe today.

Gospel Eyewitnesses?

Church-funded scholars uphold a religious myth which the church has been trying to uphold for centuries: the myth of apostolic eyewitnesses to Jesus. But if the Gospels were written by apostles or their companions, that would be the very first thing that Gospel writers would say about themselves.

Just compare Josephus: almost the very first thing he does in his history of the Jewish war is establish his authority as an eyewitness. Josephus has a right to write about the Jewish war. And why? Because he was there, and he tells you he was there, and he tells you what he saw and heard sometimes in the first person.

None of the Gospel writers act this way.

Subscribe to get access

Read more of this content when you subscribe today.

Interested in further info? Check out my course Re-dating the Gospels–without Apologetics

The Politics of the New Testament

Some people want to present New Testament scholarship as a kind of science with “assured results.” The fact is, the discipline is shot through with political and religious ideology even when people aim to seem objective. If you don’t understand the role of money and politics in this field, you will inevitably fail to understand the fragility of its “assured results.”

America is the great experiment in religious education. After the Second World War, it tried out something that had not been widely implemented before: it fostered the study of the Bible in public universities and colleges across the nation. Between about 1960 and 2010, biblical studies flourished in secular departments of religion. Here the forces of favoritism privileging Christianity were—though never completely overcome—at least tamed. The study of the Bible was seen as important in America, because the Bible was a cultural icon, and understanding it is truly important for understanding western art, literature, film, law, and so on.

Subscribe to get access

Read more of this content when you subscribe today.

Re-dating the Gospels—without Apologetics

How is it that Christian apologists and mainline scholars of the New Testament can disagree on everything about the Gospels except when they were written? Bart Ehrman published his 8th edition of The New Testament: A Historical Introduction in 2024. A lot has changed in the book—but not the dates. Mark is still “after 70.” Matthew is 80-100 CE, as is Luke. John, finally, is “around 100.” The “other gospels” such as the Gospels of Peter and Thomas, we are told, are “much later than the events they narrate and are highly legendary” (238).

What’s going on here? Ehrman is a critical scholar, but he’s supporting dates that conservatives can happily live with. This late first century dating of the four Gospels has become modern academic orthodoxy. This consensus hides the fact that date ranges for the Gospels are incredibly wide, reaching anywhere from the 40s to the 160s. How is it that one scholar can date the Gospel “according to Mark” to 45 and another to 145? What goes into dating the texts of the Gospels and those of the New Testament more broadly?

You can search far and wide for an academic course focusing on Gospel dating. You might find a seminary, divinity school, or theology department willing to teach you gospel scholarship. You can saw off your leg, then your arm to get into the course. If it’s a conservative Bible college, you can leave your brain at the door as well—because they’re just going to give you more rehash from the church fathers about mythical apostolic figures names Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. The books you can get on redating the New Testament are typically by traditional scholars or Evangelicals using the same old myths and models that Irenaeus used in the late 2nd century.

Have you ever really wanted to take a deep dive into the dating question? To really understand how scholars come up with the date of an ancient Gospel text? Have you ever truly wanted to understand why a text that pastors and pundits place next to Jesus is really closer to Justin Martyr and Irenaeus in the second century? Well, as of this moment, you have available to you an opportunity to take the course “Re-dating the Gospels—without Apologetics.”

In this course show how scholars can reliably date an ancient document. I don’t just focus on canonical texts, either, but I bring in figures like Marcion to help you think in new ways about what he calls “the wave model” of Gospel scholarship. You can take my course anytime, anywhere there’s an internet connection—without moving house or taking out a second mortgage.

So check it out: https://bc-6561.freshlearn.com/RedatingGospels

Nag Hammadi and Gnostic Literature

For centuries, scholars depended on heresiologists for their information about Christian Gnostics. But now we can hear their truths from their own lips, thanks to the discovery of about thirty previously unknown writings near the town of Nag Hammadi, Egypt shortly after the Second World War. These writings are enclosed in a set of thirteen books (called codices) copied, it seems, around the mid-fourth century CE.

Apart from the Dead Sea Scrolls, the discovery of the Nag Hammadi literature was the most important archaeological discovery of the twentieth century. The Nag Hammadi library contains about fifty tractates total, many of them Christian, most of them previously unknown. The writings included were composed from the early second to the early fourth century CE. They were originally written in Greek, but translated into the Egyptian language of the time, called Coptic. They were gathered together by later (possibly monastic) readers until they were hidden away in sealed jars.

Most of the writings appear in genres familiar to the New Testament: gospels, epistles, and apocalypses. There are also philosophical texts, maxims, prayers, and poetry. The texts fall into three main categories: Sethian, Valentinian, and Hermetic. Yes, the Nag Hammadi corpus contains three Hermetic tracts, one of which—the Discourse on the Eighth and Ninth—was completely new and unheard of.

The Valentinian tractates include that masterpiece homily perhaps spoken by Valentinus himself, the Gospel of Truth, as well as the Gospel of Philip, and the Treatise on Resurrection. The Nag Hammadi find also includes three copies of that archetypal Sethian Gnostic text, the Secret Book of John. But other Sethian text are also included, such as the Holy Book of the Great Invisible Spirit, the Apocalypse of Adam, and Trimorphic Protennoia.

There are many borderline Gnostic texts that—even though they are officially uncategorized—they are immensely important for understanding how Christian thought and practice developed. Here we can include philosophical texts like Eugnostus, the Wisdom of Jesus Christ, rewritings of Genesis like the Nature of the Rulers, the Origin of the World, and gospel-like texts such as the Secret Book of James and the Letter of Peter to Philip. And we dare not forget unforgettable texts like Thunder Perfect Mind, the First and Second Apocalypse of James, the Apocalypse of Peter, the Second Discourse of Great Seth, the Prayer of Paul, and the Apocalypse of Paul. These were the books literally excluded from the canon and buried for some 1600 years.

Nag Hammadi codex 2 contains the only surviving complete copy of that spiritual masterpiece, the Gospel of Thomas. Scholars debate whether this text was written in Syria or Egypt, whether it contains authentic sayings of Jesus, whether it was written in the first or second century. But there is no doubt that it is one of the most amazing and though-provoking witnesses of Christian spirituality.

Christianity in the Gospel of Thomas is Christianity without a cross, without an apocalypse, without a final judgment. It is the Christianity in which female disciples like Mary and Salome speak, where “doubting” Thomas is the hero, and the Old Testament is barely in sight. The only miracles you’ll find in the Gospel of Thomas are the miracles that happen within you when you read and meditate on Jesus’ sayings. “Whoever discovers the interpretation of these sayings will not taste death.”

Finally, I’ll say more about that archetypal Sethian text the Secret Book of John. In my view, this is still the best introduction to Gnostic Christian literature. The Secret Book of Johnis a dialogue gospel arguably designed to be a continuation of the Gospel according to John. It sets the conditions for why John is considered the “eagle” of apostolic—and esoteric—learning, the disciple whom Jesus loved more than others. The short answer: he was loved more, because he knew more.

The Secret Book of John has been called the “Gnostic Bible”  the preeminent expression of “Classic Gnostic”/“Sethian” thought. At the same time, the Secret Book is a profoundly Christian text. This remains the case even if one removes the frame story introducing John and Jesus. The Secret Book was written by a Christian theologian in antiquity and used (that we know of) solely by Christians, ending up—in multiple copies—in what seems to have been a monastic book collection.

The Secret Book of John is the gnostic attempt to rewrite the Bible—specifically to reframe and rephrase the first seven chapters of Genesis. It will introduce you to all the main characters of Gnostic Christian lore, including the Father, Barbelo, the Selfborn, the evil creator Yaldabaoth, his angelic minions, as well as human characters like Seth, Adam, Eve, Cain, Abel, and Noah. It is a captivating, holy history that inverts everything you’ve been taught about the biblical world.

The Secret Book of John is Christian philosophy performed through narrative. Philosophers like Plutarch also told dialogic narratives to relate their philosophy. Middle Platonic philosophers retold the myth of Plato’s Timaeus. Like the Middle Platonists, the author(s) of the Secret Bookdistinguished a singular, monadic deity from the creator/demiurge. There are certain features of bookthat cannot be explained without knowing some basic concepts from Stoic, Platonic, and Neopythagorean philosophy (e.g. numeric differentiation from Monad to Dyad to Tetrad, Pentad, and Decad, the use of concepts like fateand a material counterfeit spirit).  

For a solid introduction to Gnostic and Nag Hammadi literature, see my Gnostic and Nag Hammadi literature course. It is broken up into two parts: part one covers Nag Hammadi codices 1-5 , and part two covers codices 6-13 . The majority of Nag Hammadi texts are covered and videos are gradually being added to ensure that every Nag Hammadi text is eventually included.